Radical Reading: Embodied Resistance
I did find it interesting that in some cases, those perceived as resisting were actually using a group of “resistors” to normalize their bodies. In many groups made up of non-normative body types, the members talk about the safety of that group space, whether it’s roller derby girls embracing their size and propensity towards “unladylike” injuries or women with body hair talking about their experiences in the somewhat artificial setting of a classroom experiment. This first chapter of the book on female body hair was actually the most relatable for me, as a female-perceived person who does not shave underarms or legs. For many women, this is an intentional form of protest, but for many of us it is simply a natural state, and others’ attempts to define us as intentional resistors can be uncomfortable.
On the whole, Embodied Resistance is a good overview of a wide range of topics related to non-normative or resisting bodies. The book does tend towards mostly white subcultures in the US, but there are exceptions. There is also a fair balance in documenting the experiences of different genders. From belly dancing while pregnant to the female dominatrix to the transgender “bathroom question,” the book will prompt plenty of interesting classroom discussions.
Note: I was bothered by the inclusion of a chapter on pro-ana, and need to mention this as a trigger warning for some readers. The authors of this chapter acknowledge the problematic nature of the movement, but it nonetheless may be very hard to read–it was for me.
Posted on September 26, 2011, in reviews and tagged body hair, book reviews, chris bobel, embodied resistance, fat, radical reading, samantha kwan. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.
I appreciate your review of this book. I have been meaning to get a copy. I received a post card for it the other day in the mail and laughed a lot that under listed topics they had to specify what bears meant.
I think you’re point about intentionality is important and one I need to think more about, perhaps even for my own work. I want to think more about that tension that can occur between unintentional “resistance” (simply existing outside the norm and being defined in opposition) and intentional resistance because I think that it can be quite blurry and that perhaps they can bleed into one another. Anyway, it was nice catching up on your posts.